A contested divorce occurs when one spouse disagrees with the terms of the divorce proposed by the other. This can involve issues such as custody, division of assets, and alimony. Below are three diverse examples of contested divorce petitions that provide insight into the different scenarios that may arise during this legal process.
In this scenario, a couple is going through a contested divorce primarily over child custody matters. The mother seeks sole custody, while the father wants joint custody.
In the petition, the mother outlines her reasons for requesting sole custody, including her stable job and the children’s established routine in her care. She emphasizes the father’s sporadic involvement and past conflicts that have raised concerns about his parenting. The father counters with his petition for joint custody, arguing that both parents should have equal rights and responsibilities in raising their children.
This example illustrates how differing views on child custody can lead to a contested divorce, requiring mediation or court intervention to resolve.
In this case, a couple is contesting the division of their shared assets, which includes a family business and a house. The wife claims that the husband has undervalued the business and is trying to hide income.
The wife files a petition detailing the financial contributions she made to the business and her involvement in its operations. She requests a forensic accountant be appointed to assess the true value of the business. The husband responds with his own petition, arguing that he is entitled to a larger share of the assets due to his role as the primary income earner.
This situation exemplifies how disagreements over asset valuation can complicate divorce proceedings, often necessitating expert evaluations.
In this example, a wife is filing for divorce and seeking alimony based on her claim that her husband’s income significantly exceeds hers, and she has been a stay-at-home parent for several years.
The wife’s petition outlines her financial needs post-divorce, citing her lack of work experience and the time spent raising their children. The husband contests her request, stating that she should be able to support herself and that he should not be responsible for providing alimony indefinitely. He files a counter-petition for limited duration alimony instead.
This case highlights the complexities surrounding alimony arrangements and the differing expectations from both parties.